EVOLUTION CAUSES AMPHIBIANS TO BE LIMBLESS
All aquatic species, mostly marine evolved some 40-50 million years ago from terrestrial tetrapod ancestors during some past ten to twelve million years. “All living whales lack hind limbs and have forelimbs modified as flippers. Their limbed ancestors such as the Eocene Ambulocetus natans use paraxial locomotion powered by limbs (1). When these species are inside the water, locomotion is facilitated by a combination of tail undulation and paddling, which use the pelvic limbs. But now modern cetaceans use oscillatory locomotion. Aquatic mammals depend much less on vision and olfactory senses than terrestrial mammals”. A major selective pressure during the transition to the aquatic environment was adaptation to underwater hearing.
Some species such as whales, dolphins and others use acoustics for communication, orientation and detecting, recognizing and localizing companions, competitors, mates, predators and prey. The external ears have been lost and thus reducing hydrodynamic resistance during swimming. Different approaches from paleontology looking on morphology, development, genetics and molecular biology has tried seek an integrated explanation for whether highly specialized phenotypes such as vertebrates that are not closely related, could result from similar genetic or developmental mechanisms. The origin and evolution of whales was addressed concerning the series of morphological changes that facilitates the progressive reduction and ultimate loss of hind limbs (2).
Genetic evaluation was done on limb loss in snakes and to leg-less lizards, to see whether similar mechanisms which have driven the loss of hind limbs in whales could have been used. Also to see to which degree has such mechanisms diverged in the evolution of similar evolutionary trends shown by limb loss. “Limb loss and concurrent morphological and physiological changes are associated with the transition from land to water is discussed within the context of the current whale phylogeny. This is mostly emphasized concerning the fore and hind limb development, how the fore limbs are transformed into flippers and how the hind limbs are regressed leaving no elements or vestigial skeletal elements. Hind limbs started regressing after the ancestor of whales entered the aquatic environment” (1). Elongation of the body during transition from land to water causes the loss of hind limbs.
In most snakes limbliness was associated with adoption of new lifestyle and was driven by developmental changes associated with elongation of the body. “Adaptation to burrowing between the parallel reflect structural and functional changes associated with the switch of locomotion to axial. However, selective pressures acting on a wide range of developmental processes and adult traits other than the limbs could have driven the loss of hind limbs in whales. All limbs less tetrapod are descended from limbed ancestors”(1). Most possess limb buds at some stage during their development. Limbless ness represents arrest of limb bud development rather than absence of limb initiation or regression of a fully formed limb.
Reference
1. Andrews, R. C. 1921. A remarkable case of external hind limb in a hump-back whale. [Internet] 2006 May 10; 08:47 UTC [Cited 2006 05 10] Available from:
http://whitelab.biology.dal.ca/lb/Bejder%20and%20Hall.pdf
2. Clark, A.J. 2005. Getting a Leg Up on Land. [Internet] 2006 May 10; 10:25 UTC [ Cited 2006 May 10] Available From:
[http://www.scientificamerican.com/print_version.cfm?articleID=000DC8B8-EA15-137C-AA1583414B7F0000 , accessed on 10/05/2006, 12:30].
Dianah Nangammbi
Cilla CSIR
P.O Box 395
Pretoria
0001
Tel: +27 12 841 2133
Cell: +27 73 121 3589
Email: dnangammbi@csir.co.za
http://wwwdianah.blogspot.com/
Some species such as whales, dolphins and others use acoustics for communication, orientation and detecting, recognizing and localizing companions, competitors, mates, predators and prey. The external ears have been lost and thus reducing hydrodynamic resistance during swimming. Different approaches from paleontology looking on morphology, development, genetics and molecular biology has tried seek an integrated explanation for whether highly specialized phenotypes such as vertebrates that are not closely related, could result from similar genetic or developmental mechanisms. The origin and evolution of whales was addressed concerning the series of morphological changes that facilitates the progressive reduction and ultimate loss of hind limbs (2).
Genetic evaluation was done on limb loss in snakes and to leg-less lizards, to see whether similar mechanisms which have driven the loss of hind limbs in whales could have been used. Also to see to which degree has such mechanisms diverged in the evolution of similar evolutionary trends shown by limb loss. “Limb loss and concurrent morphological and physiological changes are associated with the transition from land to water is discussed within the context of the current whale phylogeny. This is mostly emphasized concerning the fore and hind limb development, how the fore limbs are transformed into flippers and how the hind limbs are regressed leaving no elements or vestigial skeletal elements. Hind limbs started regressing after the ancestor of whales entered the aquatic environment” (1). Elongation of the body during transition from land to water causes the loss of hind limbs.
In most snakes limbliness was associated with adoption of new lifestyle and was driven by developmental changes associated with elongation of the body. “Adaptation to burrowing between the parallel reflect structural and functional changes associated with the switch of locomotion to axial. However, selective pressures acting on a wide range of developmental processes and adult traits other than the limbs could have driven the loss of hind limbs in whales. All limbs less tetrapod are descended from limbed ancestors”(1). Most possess limb buds at some stage during their development. Limbless ness represents arrest of limb bud development rather than absence of limb initiation or regression of a fully formed limb.
Reference
1. Andrews, R. C. 1921. A remarkable case of external hind limb in a hump-back whale. [Internet] 2006 May 10; 08:47 UTC [Cited 2006 05 10] Available from:
http://whitelab.biology.dal.ca/lb/Bejder%20and%20Hall.pdf
2. Clark, A.J. 2005. Getting a Leg Up on Land. [Internet] 2006 May 10; 10:25 UTC [ Cited 2006 May 10] Available From:
[http://www.scientificamerican.com/print_version.cfm?articleID=000DC8B8-EA15-137C-AA1583414B7F0000 , accessed on 10/05/2006, 12:30].
Dianah Nangammbi
Cilla CSIR
P.O Box 395
Pretoria
0001
Tel: +27 12 841 2133
Cell: +27 73 121 3589
Email: dnangammbi@csir.co.za
http://wwwdianah.blogspot.com/
74 Comments:
Your introductory paragraph is nearly entirely the work of someone else - please don't quote lengthy sections of text (and the citation should come at the end of the quotation). Your second paragraph appears to be plagiarized to some extent. These errors recur throughout your essay,which is guilty of pretty much every mistake discussed in my plagiarism post, so please read that carefully.
Also...you discuss limblessness in whales and snake, and don't even bother to relate this to amphibians. And a few more references would be nice.
Nick
By NcK, at May 25, 2006 10:30 AM
8hMRU4 The best blog you have!
By Anonymous, at November 02, 2007 12:36 PM
6U7C5f Nice Article.
By Anonymous, at November 02, 2007 7:35 PM
actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.
By Anonymous, at November 02, 2007 8:24 PM
Thanks to author.
By Anonymous, at November 02, 2007 9:06 PM
Thanks to author.
By Anonymous, at November 02, 2007 10:11 PM
Good job!
By Anonymous, at November 03, 2007 12:43 PM
Thanks to author.
By Anonymous, at November 03, 2007 5:23 PM
Wonderful blog.
By Anonymous, at November 03, 2007 6:24 PM
actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.
By Anonymous, at November 03, 2007 7:24 PM
Wonderful blog.
By Anonymous, at November 03, 2007 8:12 PM
XD4xOb write more, thanks.
By Anonymous, at November 04, 2007 9:16 PM
actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 6:01 AM
Please write anything else!
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 6:35 AM
Wonderful blog.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 9:00 AM
Please write anything else!
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 9:33 AM
Magnific!
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 10:02 AM
Wonderful blog.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 10:34 AM
Magnific!
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 11:04 AM
Wonderful blog.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 11:43 AM
Magnific!
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 12:27 PM
Magnific!
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 1:03 PM
Wonderful blog.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 1:33 PM
If ignorance is bliss, you must be orgasmic.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 2:04 PM
Beam me aboard, Scotty..... Sure. Will a 2x10 do?
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 2:42 PM
Hello all!
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 3:19 PM
A lot of people mistake a short memory for a clear conscience.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 3:47 PM
What is a free gift ? Aren't all gifts free?
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 4:15 PM
The gene pool could use a little chlorine.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 4:52 PM
Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 5:23 PM
Oops. My brain just hit a bad sector.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 5:55 PM
Good job!
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 6:27 PM
Build a watch in 179 easy steps - by C. Forsberg.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 6:57 PM
Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 8:06 PM
What is a free gift ? Aren't all gifts free?
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 8:48 PM
Beam me aboard, Scotty..... Sure. Will a 2x10 do?
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 9:28 PM
If ignorance is bliss, you must be orgasmic.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 10:02 PM
If ignorance is bliss, you must be orgasmic.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 10:37 PM
Nice Article.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 11:08 PM
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 11:33 PM
actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 12:01 AM
When there's a will, I want to be in it.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 12:31 AM
Oops. My brain just hit a bad sector.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 12:59 AM
A lot of people mistake a short memory for a clear conscience.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 1:36 AM
Give me ambiguity or give me something else.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 2:08 AM
When there's a will, I want to be in it.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 2:46 AM
What is a free gift ? Aren't all gifts free?
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 3:19 AM
If ignorance is bliss, you must be orgasmic.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 3:50 AM
Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 4:21 AM
When there's a will, I want to be in it.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 4:56 AM
640K ought to be enough for anybody. - Bill Gates 81
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 5:42 AM
Give me ambiguity or give me something else.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 6:20 AM
Ever notice how fast Windows runs? Neither did I.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 6:53 AM
Calvin, we will not have an anatomically correct snowman!
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 7:35 AM
Thanks to author.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 8:41 AM
Please write anything else!
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 9:24 AM
Save the whales, collect the whole set
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 10:05 AM
640K ought to be enough for anybody. - Bill Gates 81
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 10:53 AM
Suicidal twin kills sister by mistake!
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 11:38 AM
Calvin, we will not have an anatomically correct snowman!
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 12:18 PM
actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 1:01 PM
640K ought to be enough for anybody. - Bill Gates 81
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 1:53 PM
If ignorance is bliss, you must be orgasmic.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 2:46 PM
Clap on! , Clap off! clap@#&$NO CARRIER
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 3:35 PM
Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 4:13 PM
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 4:53 PM
Give me ambiguity or give me something else.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 5:31 PM
Clap on! , Clap off! clap@#&$NO CARRIER
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 6:03 PM
The gene pool could use a little chlorine.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 6:46 PM
Magnific!
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 7:29 PM
Hello all!
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 8:09 PM
Magnific!
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 8:55 PM
640K ought to be enough for anybody. - Bill Gates 81
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 9:47 PM
Nice Article.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 10:28 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home