GENETICALLY MODIFIED SUICIDE...
Recently I read an interesting article in the Science and Technology section of the Sunday Times. The article was on genetically modified insects, specifically mosquitoes in order to control disease.
We are all aware of Malaria, but not many of us know how it “works” or what it actually is. Malaria is caused by a parasite (representatives of the genus Plasmodium) that infects the blood and is transmitted to potential hosts through the saliva of the mosquito. According to the article, Malaria is second only to HIV and AIDS when it comes to how many people it kills each year. This is estimated to be around 2.7 million lives annually.
What scientists have done is to genetically engineer a mosquito that is resistant to the parasite itself, which can drastically impact the efficiency of transmission. The proposal is to release these mosquitoes into the wild where malaria is prevalent and where the natural biodiversity exists which includes the genetic component of the wild mosquitoes. In wild mosquitoes, the actual infection with malaria parasites does impact that mosquito’s reproductive potential, however previous studies with genetically modified mosquitoes proved that the wild forms were still fitter. Basically what this means is that even though genetically modified mosquitoes could have been introduced into the wild population earlier, they would have been out-competed by the wild forms which were genetically predisposed to survive better in the environment. Now unfortunately, the scientists seem to have unlocked this barrier and have now produced a genetically modified form that is fitter than the wild form!
So you may ask what this has to do with biodiversity then? Well, since a component of biodiversity is genetic, the introduction of a genetically modified mosquito would eventually cause the local extinction of the wild gene pool. What is more alarming is the apparent lack of forethought in the scientists who have not even mentioned the concern over the effects of co-evolution in parasitism, which can occur at a faster rate in the parasite than in the host. The Red Queen Hypothesis explains that parasites and their hosts are in a continuous battle or evolutionary “arms race” and that each has to keep up to remain within the folds of a dynamic equilibrium. If the mosquitoes that are introduced have a genetically predisposed higher resistance to the actual parasite, it is almost certain that this would fuel a reciprocal response in the parasite’s evolution in order to survive. If this response is to produce more aggressive forms of Plasmodium spp., the result could be even worse for infected people…
Something to think about.
David Vaughan
Senior aquarist, Quarantine
Two Oceans Aquarium
Cape Town, South Africa
+27 21 418 38 23
dvaughan@aquarium.co.za
Article in Sunday Times, 25 March 2007, Science and Technology, page 33.
Image credit:
We are all aware of Malaria, but not many of us know how it “works” or what it actually is. Malaria is caused by a parasite (representatives of the genus Plasmodium) that infects the blood and is transmitted to potential hosts through the saliva of the mosquito. According to the article, Malaria is second only to HIV and AIDS when it comes to how many people it kills each year. This is estimated to be around 2.7 million lives annually.
What scientists have done is to genetically engineer a mosquito that is resistant to the parasite itself, which can drastically impact the efficiency of transmission. The proposal is to release these mosquitoes into the wild where malaria is prevalent and where the natural biodiversity exists which includes the genetic component of the wild mosquitoes. In wild mosquitoes, the actual infection with malaria parasites does impact that mosquito’s reproductive potential, however previous studies with genetically modified mosquitoes proved that the wild forms were still fitter. Basically what this means is that even though genetically modified mosquitoes could have been introduced into the wild population earlier, they would have been out-competed by the wild forms which were genetically predisposed to survive better in the environment. Now unfortunately, the scientists seem to have unlocked this barrier and have now produced a genetically modified form that is fitter than the wild form!
So you may ask what this has to do with biodiversity then? Well, since a component of biodiversity is genetic, the introduction of a genetically modified mosquito would eventually cause the local extinction of the wild gene pool. What is more alarming is the apparent lack of forethought in the scientists who have not even mentioned the concern over the effects of co-evolution in parasitism, which can occur at a faster rate in the parasite than in the host. The Red Queen Hypothesis explains that parasites and their hosts are in a continuous battle or evolutionary “arms race” and that each has to keep up to remain within the folds of a dynamic equilibrium. If the mosquitoes that are introduced have a genetically predisposed higher resistance to the actual parasite, it is almost certain that this would fuel a reciprocal response in the parasite’s evolution in order to survive. If this response is to produce more aggressive forms of Plasmodium spp., the result could be even worse for infected people…
Something to think about.
David Vaughan
Senior aquarist, Quarantine
Two Oceans Aquarium
Cape Town, South Africa
+27 21 418 38 23
dvaughan@aquarium.co.za
Article in Sunday Times, 25 March 2007, Science and Technology, page 33.
Image credit:
82 Comments:
Very interesting article. I think thary are "playing" a very dangerous game that could be very catastrophic.
By Eager, at March 30, 2007 11:23 AM
Very interesting article. I think they are "playing" a very dangerous game that could be very catastrophic.
By Eager, at March 30, 2007 11:24 AM
Hi Rosemary
It could certainly be a problem if scientists fail to communicate with each other. Sometimes the will to see the actual project completed out-weighs potentially negative drawbacks.
Cheers
David
By davidvaughan, at March 30, 2007 12:37 PM
Dear David,
The article you refer to certainly sketches a very concerning scenario. I am slightly confused though...You mention that "..the proposal is to release these mosquitos into the wild where malaria is prevalent and where natural biodiversity exists..etc etc". What was the actual aim of the study?
I also dont think that genetically modified forms will neccessarily "outcompete" wild forms-e.g they may be reproductively compatible. In conclusion I think that it is very important to evaluate the merits and shortfalls of popular journalism (ref. Sunday Times).
By Dane, at March 31, 2007 8:43 AM
Hi Dane
Firstly, the aim of the study as indicated in the posting is for the reduction in Plasmodium infestation. It is also stated that the genetically modified mosquitoes have been designed to be "fitter" than their wild counterparts, which means that they have a better chance of overall survival. This directly indicates that over time, the "fitter" forms will dominate the ecosystem to the detriment of the wild forms. They may well be reproductively compatible, however, the "fitness" gene will be passed on once again to dominate the normal gene, which will become locally extinct over time (part of our Biodiversity course touched on the genetic-level of biodiversity). This happens as more and more Phenotypes representing the Genotype of the GM mosquitoes survive in everyday situation to become sexually mature. If we have a population of say 100 wild mosquitoes that are reproductively compromised by the presence of Plasmodium infestation (they are the intermediate hosts and it is well documented that Plasmodium reduces lifespan and reproductive potential), and if we add say 10 GM mosquitoes to the wild population that are not only resistant to becoming intermediate hosts to begin with, but due to the lack of reproductive compromise, they can reproduce at a faster rate and more successfully, their Genotype would dominate. So you see, the GM mosquitoe's genes ARE the problem.
Journalism is quite subjective I agree, but in this case, not all is said regarding the dangers in messing with genetics. Regardless of the GM product, we actually cannot fully control the outcome or the process.
If you are still unclear on GM products and their potentially destructive outcomes, please chat to either myself, Gwen or Richard for some more clarification.
Cheers
David
By davidvaughan, at April 01, 2007 10:34 AM
This article certainly got some comments. The reality is the social/health benefits of introducing malaria-resistant super fit Mosquitoes will be short lived - the parasite Plasmodium populations are almost certain to respond by becoming resistant to the GM Mosquito and we have an ever bigger problem, since these super-fit GM mosquitoes will have less natural enemies and become even more prevalent in the environment. Have we not learnt from DDT and other substances and developing resistant forms? The genetic engineering is one of the most arrogant of human endeavours and will cause tears at some time in the future.
By Rich Knight, at April 01, 2007 1:31 PM
uYtlGY The best blog you have!
By Anonymous, at November 02, 2007 1:07 PM
kb4aMn Nice Article.
By Anonymous, at November 02, 2007 7:52 PM
Thanks to author.
By Anonymous, at November 02, 2007 8:40 PM
Thanks to author.
By Anonymous, at November 02, 2007 9:25 PM
Thanks to author.
By Anonymous, at November 02, 2007 10:34 PM
Thanks to author.
By Anonymous, at November 02, 2007 11:35 PM
Thanks to author.
By Anonymous, at November 03, 2007 1:06 PM
Wonderful blog.
By Anonymous, at November 03, 2007 5:45 PM
Please write anything else!
By Anonymous, at November 03, 2007 6:49 PM
Nice Article.
By Anonymous, at November 03, 2007 7:43 PM
Please write anything else!
By Anonymous, at November 03, 2007 8:27 PM
JUns5w write more, thanks.
By Anonymous, at November 04, 2007 9:56 PM
Wonderful blog.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 6:02 AM
Magnific!
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 6:37 AM
actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 8:27 AM
Hello all!
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 9:02 AM
Hello all!
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 9:34 AM
Magnific!
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 10:03 AM
Thanks to author.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 10:36 AM
actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 11:05 AM
Good job!
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 11:45 AM
Hello all!
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 12:29 PM
Good job!
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 1:04 PM
Good job!
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 1:35 PM
Thanks to author.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 2:06 PM
Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 2:43 PM
Please write anything else!
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 3:21 PM
Energizer Bunny Arrested! Charged with battery.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 4:16 PM
When there's a will, I want to be in it.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 4:53 PM
Give me ambiguity or give me something else.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 5:23 PM
Clap on! , Clap off! clap@#&$NO CARRIER
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 5:56 PM
Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 6:28 PM
Thanks to author.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 6:59 PM
Good job!
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 7:31 PM
Build a watch in 179 easy steps - by C. Forsberg.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 8:07 PM
Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 8:51 PM
Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 9:30 PM
Magnific!
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 10:03 PM
Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 10:39 PM
All generalizations are false, including this one.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 11:10 PM
The gene pool could use a little chlorine.
By Anonymous, at November 05, 2007 11:34 PM
Energizer Bunny Arrested! Charged with battery.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 12:02 AM
Magnific!
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 12:33 AM
640K ought to be enough for anybody. - Bill Gates 81
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 1:02 AM
When there's a will, I want to be in it.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 1:39 AM
Please write anything else!
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 2:09 AM
All generalizations are false, including this one.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 2:48 AM
Ever notice how fast Windows runs? Neither did I.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 3:20 AM
C++ should have been called B
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 3:51 AM
Magnific!
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 4:23 AM
Wonderful blog.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 4:58 AM
Suicidal twin kills sister by mistake!
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 5:43 AM
Nice Article.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 6:21 AM
Suicidal twin kills sister by mistake!
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 6:55 AM
Energizer Bunny Arrested! Charged with battery.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 7:38 AM
Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 8:09 AM
Calvin, we will not have an anatomically correct snowman!
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 8:42 AM
C++ should have been called B
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 9:25 AM
640K ought to be enough for anybody. - Bill Gates 81
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 10:07 AM
Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 10:55 AM
A flashlight is a case for holding dead batteries.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 11:40 AM
Thanks to author.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 12:22 PM
Ever notice how fast Windows runs? Neither did I.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 1:02 PM
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 1:56 PM
640K ought to be enough for anybody. - Bill Gates 81
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 2:48 PM
Build a watch in 179 easy steps - by C. Forsberg.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 3:37 PM
Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 4:14 PM
Ever notice how fast Windows runs? Neither did I.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 4:54 PM
A flashlight is a case for holding dead batteries.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 5:32 PM
Thanks to author.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 6:05 PM
Thanks to author.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 6:49 PM
Good job!
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 7:32 PM
Calvin, we will not have an anatomically correct snowman!
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 8:10 PM
Calvin, we will not have an anatomically correct snowman!
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 8:57 PM
What is a free gift ? Aren't all gifts free?
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 9:50 PM
Energizer Bunny Arrested! Charged with battery.
By Anonymous, at November 06, 2007 10:29 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home